An aging freak who fell in love with the history of science and now lives mostly in the 16th century.
The longer version about me is here.
What this blog is primarily about is here
If your philosophy of [scientific] history claims that the sequence should have been A→B→C, and it is C→A→B, then your philosophy of history is wrong. You have to take the data of history seriously.
John S. Wilkins 30th August 2009
|Bob Hatch on The man who inverted and squar…|
|Bill Storage on Why there weren’t any scientis…|
|Chris on Copernicus and the calend…|
|Whewell’s Gaze… on A breath of fresh air|
|Whewell’s Gaze… on Born under a bad sign.|