Riffing off the title of this blog and the question, when was the Scientific Renaissance I develop my thoughts on the problems of dividing history up into artificial periods.
If your philosophy of [scientific] history claims that the sequence should have been A→B→C, and it is C→A→B, then your philosophy of history is wrong. You have to take the data of history seriously.
John S. Wilkins 30th August 2009
|Cleotilde Westmeyer on Why The Imitation Game is a di…|
|Craw on Can we please stop (mis)quotin…|
|Miss Booleana on A Lady Logician|
|Thony C. on Did Isaac leap or was he …|
|Michael Weiss on Did Isaac leap or was he …|