Riffing off the title of this blog and the question, when was the Scientific Renaissance I develop my thoughts on the problems of dividing history up into artificial periods.
If your philosophy of [scientific] history claims that the sequence should have been A→B→C, and it is C→A→B, then your philosophy of history is wrong. You have to take the data of history seriously.
John S. Wilkins 30th August 2009
|Huenemann on From astronomy to literature –…|
|Ted Cruz and the Edg… on Galileo, Foscarini, The Cathol…|
|The Book of Nature i… on The Book of Nature is written…|
|Koos on The Book of Nature is written…|
|Whewell’s Gaze… on Calendrical confusion or just…|