Riffing off the title of this blog and the question, when was the Scientific Renaissance I develop my thoughts on the problems of dividing history up into artificial periods.
If your philosophy of [scientific] history claims that the sequence should have been A→B→C, and it is C→A→B, then your philosophy of history is wrong. You have to take the data of history seriously.
John S. Wilkins 30th August 2009
|The problem with sup… on Apart from Muhammad Ali there…|
|Whewell’s Gazette: Y… on Measure for measure|
|Whewell’s Gazette: Y… on 126 Arguments|
|Whewell’s Gazette: Y… on Who put the names on the …|
|Thony C. on The Man from Nowhere|