If your philosophy of [scientific] history claims that the sequence should have been A→B→C, and it is C→A→B, then your philosophy of history is wrong. You have to take the data of history seriously.
John S. Wilkins 30th August 2009
|thonyc on It wasn’t the first but…|
|Joey on It wasn’t the first but…|
|josephdesouza on The history of “scientist…|
|Whewell’s Gaze… on Reaching for the stars|
|Whewell’s Gaze… on A maths book from a paint…|