The obsessions of the village atheists aren’t a good basis for doing history.
Jim Harrison in the comments at EvolutionBlog
If your philosophy of [scientific] history claims that the sequence should have been A→B→C, and it is C→A→B, then your philosophy of history is wrong. You have to take the data of history seriously.
John S. Wilkins 30th August 2009
|Monique on Why The Imitation Game is a di…|
|Ian Wragg (@ian_wrag… on Perpetuating the myths|
|Thony C. on Perpetuating the myths addendu…|
|Phillip Helbig on Perpetuating the myths addendu…|
|11 Things We Learned… on The widespread and persistent…|