The obsessions of the village atheists aren’t a good basis for doing history.
Jim Harrison in the comments at EvolutionBlog
If your philosophy of [scientific] history claims that the sequence should have been A→B→C, and it is C→A→B, then your philosophy of history is wrong. You have to take the data of history seriously.
John S. Wilkins 30th August 2009
|Thony C. on On an excursion|
|Laurence Cox on On an excursion|
|Whewell’s Gazette: Y… on Christoph and the Calenda…|
|Whewell’s Gazette: Y… on A loser who was really a …|
|Whewell’s Gazette: Y… on The house where Emmy live…|