Riffing off the title of this blog and the question, when was the Scientific Renaissance I develop my thoughts on the problems of dividing history up into artificial periods.
If your philosophy of [scientific] history claims that the sequence should have been A→B→C, and it is C→A→B, then your philosophy of history is wrong. You have to take the data of history seriously.
John S. Wilkins 30th August 2009
|Childhood, war games… on Childhood, war games and becom…|
|Lists | συμποσίον ἀκ… on Lists!|
|Michael Weiss on Another one bites the dus…|
|Phillip Helbig on Another one bites the dus…|
|Robert Bellarmine an… on Galileo, the Church and Helioc…|