Riffing off the title of this blog and the question, when was the Scientific Renaissance I develop my thoughts on the problems of dividing history up into artificial periods.
If your philosophy of [scientific] history claims that the sequence should have been A→B→C, and it is C→A→B, then your philosophy of history is wrong. You have to take the data of history seriously.
John S. Wilkins 30th August 2009
|Carnivalia — 6… on Giants’ Shoulders #60 Part I:…|
|Baerista on How to insult an entire p…|
|Michael Weiss on How to insult an entire p…|
|rick rappaport on The Swerve is really a full-fr…|
|Jeb on Why history?|